Guthrie Govan Discussion :: View topic - The Fender Body Shape Trademark Case
Help support this site by shopping at Amazon through our link.
Guthrie Govan Discussion Forum Index

Guthrie Govan Discussion
The Official Guthrie Govan Discussion Board

www.GuthrieGovan.co.uk

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

 

 
The Fender Body Shape Trademark Case

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Guthrie Govan Discussion Forum Index -> Guthrie Tones and Gear
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
alexkhan



Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 2783
Location: Chino, CA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:31 pm    Post subject: The Fender Body Shape Trademark Case Reply with quote

As some of you may or may not know, we (Suhr Guitars) along with a consortium of other companies that includes Anderson, Sadowsky, Schecter, ESP, Peavey, US Music Corp., Lakland, Warmoth and some others, have been in litigation with Fender regarding Fender trying to trademark the Strat, Tele, P-Bass, and Jazz Bass body shapes (some 50 years after these instruments were introduced). This litigation has been going on for about 5 years now with millions spent on legal fees by both sides.

Well, the verdict is in from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and... We won!!!

The Strat, Tele, P-Bass and J-Bass body shapes are generic, in public domain and free for anyone to use. This is a historical Federal citable case and we'd like to thank and congratulate all in the consortium of opposers to Fender's trademark application. These companies include Anderson, Schecter, Warmoth, ESP, First Act, Peavey and another dozen or so.

The sky is all clear and sunny now. This whole thing had been like a dark cloud hanging over our heads and now the cloud is dispersed for good. Man, I'd just love to walk through the offices of Fender HQ and see the look on the faces of the execs there who thought they were going to get away with this. They got totally pwned in this case and I can't help but gloat over the outcome of this decision. Very Happy

Here is a link to the USPTO docket with the decision. It's a 75-page PDF document that can be viewed on the browser or downloaded and saved.

http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91162497&pty=OPP&eno=13
_________________
Ed Yoon
Certified Guthrie Fan-atic
BOING Music LLC - Managing Partner
.strandberg* Guitars USA
Ed Yoon Consulting & Management
Guitar Center Inc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
splatter



Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great news... I would have thought that trying to retroactively trademark a design would be laughed out of court right away.
Out of curiosity - if Fender HAD won, could Suhr et al. just shave, say, a millimeter off of one of the horns or something, so the shape would be similar to a strat, but not exactly the same?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PGA n00b



Joined: 21 Mar 2009
Posts: 55

PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

great, you did it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alexkhan



Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 2783
Location: Chino, CA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What made this trademark issue scary is that Fender just submitted generic drawings (without dimensions written out or anything like that) of each body shape (Strat, Tele and P-Bass) and essentially wanted to trademark the look. There's no telling how far they would have gone to enforce the trademark had they won.

The Suhr Classic and Classic T shapes are not identical to the Fender Strat and Tele shapes. In fact, a Fender Strat pickguard won't fit on the Classic body because the dimensions and the screw-hole spacing are different. There's no question that the Classic and Classic T shapes are our takes on the Strat and Tele designs, but there are subtle differences.

Anyway, our main models are now the Modern and Standard anyway. We made a conscious effort to get away from the Strat and Tele "clone" designs and focus on the Modern and Standard models to be the Suhr identity, but we'll always build what customers want. The Classic and T models are still very popular and Guthrie digs 'em too! Wink
_________________
Ed Yoon
Certified Guthrie Fan-atic
BOING Music LLC - Managing Partner
.strandberg* Guitars USA
Ed Yoon Consulting & Management
Guitar Center Inc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PGA n00b



Joined: 21 Mar 2009
Posts: 55

PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

alexkhan wrote:
What made this trademark issue scary is that Fender just submitted generic drawings (without dimensions written out or anything like that) of each body shape (Strat, Tele and P-Bass) and essentially wanted to trademark the look. There's no telling how far they would have gone to enforce the trademark had they won.


OMG thank god you won! If they had the trademark for just the look, it could have been the end for many luthiers or small guitar companys.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Guthrie Govan Discussion Forum Index -> Guthrie Tones and Gear All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group