Guthrie Govan Discussion :: View topic - Guthrie's Pleasant Weirdness and Jarring Extremisms
Help support this site by shopping at Amazon through our link.
Guthrie Govan Discussion Forum Index

Guthrie Govan Discussion
The Official Guthrie Govan Discussion Board

www.GuthrieGovan.co.uk

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

 

 
Guthrie's Pleasant Weirdness and Jarring Extremisms
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Guthrie Govan Discussion Forum Index -> Guthrie Govan Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
alexkhan



Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 2783
Location: Chino, CA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:22 pm    Post subject: Guthrie's Pleasant Weirdness and Jarring Extremisms Reply with quote

Guthrie's occasional and unpredictable ventures into the left field always make me smile even though it may initially make you go: Confused Question The title track certainly has plenty of it. The first solo's ending phrase (not the intro leading into the main melody line) in 'Ner Ner' I find so cool and extreme. There are various high-pitched shrieks that jar you but they all make sense and enhance what are around them. There are Guthrie's trademark minor-second interval elephant belches. I like 'em! Twisted Evil

Players like Satch, Vai, and Buckethead tend to venture into such territories of extreme expression, but here's another area that Guthrie outdoes 'em all with the extreme bends, squeals, screams, shrieks, burps, belching, groans, etc. The world isn't always so pretty and art reflects life or is it the other way around? Whatever the case, I can relate and Guthrie's weirdness and extremisms have his own signature and thumbprint on 'em. It's primal expression that can, at times, be a challenge to absorb, but it's one of those no-pain-no-gain kinda things. 'Hangover' has a good deal of it as well and it's all so appropriate - some very musical noise...
_________________
Ed Yoon
Certified Guthrie Fan-atic
BOING Music LLC - Managing Partner
.strandberg* Guitars USA
Ed Yoon Consulting & Management
Guitar Center Inc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
frankus



Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 1100
Location: Chelmsford/Arachnipus

PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yup, me and a mate attributed our odd-ballness to both being lefties and flaunting it... we decided to make Guthrie an honourary left hander, but frankly he'd trumped our freakflag Sad
_________________
Fabulous powers were revealed to me the day I held my magic Suhr(d) aloft and said "by the power of great scale!"

I have the power!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tore



Joined: 13 Sep 2005
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That is actually one of the things I appreciate most about Guthrie's music. He's there alongside a very small handful of guitar players (or musicians in general) that just seem like they can do no wrong on the intrument. No matter what squeal, pickup noise or even mistake they make it just seem to fit perfectly in the music. It's as if they have so much control over the instrument that they can just let go of the wheel and totally loose control and still come out alright. Kinda like Van Halen describing his solos as falling down the stairs and always landing on your feet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alexkhan



Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Posts: 2783
Location: Chino, CA

PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tore wrote:
That is actually one of the things I appreciate most about Guthrie's music. He's there alongside a very small handful of guitar players (or musicians in general) that just seem like they can do no wrong on the intrument. No matter what squeal, pickup noise or even mistake they make it just seem to fit perfectly in the music. It's as if they have so much control over the instrument that they can just let go of the wheel and totally loose control and still come out alright. Kinda like Van Halen describing his solos as falling down the stairs and always landing on your feet.


The thing about Guthrie is that he's in total control yet he can make it sound like he's on the edge about to lose control - that's what gets me. Jeff Beck and Mike Landau (and even Pat Metheny) are some other players who exhibit that type of command but still make it sound like they may lose it any second. That kind of edginess and tension is something I always look for in great players and in their playing. Many players don't like to take such chances, especially on record. Guthrie isn't polite easy-listening muzak! Twisted Evil
_________________
Ed Yoon
Certified Guthrie Fan-atic
BOING Music LLC - Managing Partner
.strandberg* Guitars USA
Ed Yoon Consulting & Management
Guitar Center Inc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ShredMeister



Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 53
Location: Spain

PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, for me, GG has that amazing phrasing quality, that even playing inside might sound outside... and he can make outside phrases sound very much home. Sometimes he reminds me of Brett Garsed in that department. Brett can play a simple dorian scale and make it sound completely out there, and I believe GG is very similar.
_________________
"Living comes much easier once we accept we´re dying"

John Petrucci
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frankus



Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 1100
Location: Chelmsford/Arachnipus

PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm reading Mark Levine's book on Jazz Theory at present and it's a ripping read.

One of the things addressed from the get go is dissonance and consonance. Annecdotal stuff like playing the flat 5 in early days would result in excommunication, or that major 7th chords were usually substituted for maj6 chords since the 7th seemed too dissonant.. or even people writing to jazz magazines (not jazz mags ;^) to complain that using the raised fourth was killing jazz..

I kinda think of all of this when I'm playing.. and when players do something that makes me wonder how to replicate that. The biggest thought is that over the years the concept of dissonance is evolving and fewer notes are seen as "jazz notes".. basically people's aural palletes are growing more robust and finding the diatonic notes cloying... think of how your perception of stilton or gruyere cheese change and Edam just seems bland.

Another point the book raises is that some players have a more mature pallete and are playing melodies that to some ears seems "out" in fact the melodic concepts are just not in the collective conscious, but may be in a few decades.

For this reason, I think of two different terms: 'avante garde' and 'out'. Out is zany and wild, avante garde is too damn futuristic for yo ass Wink
_________________
Fabulous powers were revealed to me the day I held my magic Suhr(d) aloft and said "by the power of great scale!"

I have the power!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Resi



Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

frankus wrote:
I'm reading Mark Levine's book on Jazz Theory at present and it's a ripping read.

One of the things addressed from the get go is dissonance and consonance. Annecdotal stuff like playing the flat 5 in early days would result in excommunication, or that major 7th chords were usually substituted for maj6 chords since the 7th seemed too dissonant.. or even people writing to jazz magazines (not jazz mags ;^) to complain that using the raised fourth was killing jazz..

I kinda think of all of this when I'm playing.. and when players do something that makes me wonder how to replicate that. The biggest thought is that over the years the concept of dissonance is evolving and fewer notes are seen as "jazz notes".. basically people's aural palletes are growing more robust and finding the diatonic notes cloying... think of how your perception of stilton or gruyere cheese change and Edam just seems bland.

Another point the book raises is that some players have a more mature pallete and are playing melodies that to some ears seems "out" in fact the melodic concepts are just not in the collective conscious, but may be in a few decades.

For this reason, I think of two different terms: 'avante garde' and 'out'. Out is zany and wild, avante garde is too damn futuristic for yo ass Wink


Yep, in that same book, Mark Levine describes the evolution of jazz as the gradual acceptance of dissonance in western music.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sumis



Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 570
Location: gothenburg, sweden

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Resi wrote:
Yep, in that same book, Mark Levine describes the evolution of jazz as the gradual acceptance of dissonance in western music.


Jazz is (an important part of) the gradual NEAUTRALIZATION of dissonance in western (POULAR) music. I.e. the turning into expected idioms what used to be uncomfortable. I.e. moving the border of what's interesting, dangerous, contemporary, relavant (or just cool) somewhere else.

The outside/inside discussion in relation to jazz or rock/popular music is all taking place WITHIN an "accepted" harmonic space. Some people are used to listening to music with more trivial harmony (for example Yngwie, who's a god BTW), but the concept of "outside" has NOTHING radical to it. It's a concept that as such demarkates and prolongs a specific order of harmony, of what's commonly accepted.

And BTW. I love #4 in jazz, and in Satch, and in Vai, and in Joe Henderson, and in Guthrie, and in Steve Reich.

I love our confined harmonic space with its outside/inside.

But what interests me most is whats outside outside ... Confused Wink

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frankus



Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 1100
Location: Chelmsford/Arachnipus

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I set about making a helix out of the cycle of fifths. If you take the major modes and work them out relative to C, you can then slap them next to the key signature that has the same notes in a cycle of fifths:

so they run

G maj - C lydian
C maj - C ionian
F maj - C mixo
Bb maj - C dorian
Eb maj - C aeolian
Ab maj - C phrygian
Db maj - C locrian

So there are 5 keys without the root note in them.. I think of these as more out.

if you do the same for the melodic minor and harmonic minor you end up with a fractured cycle of fifths with modes on them, and fewer gaps and several modes in some places.

If you do the same for the next item in a cycle of fifths there'll be loads of over lapping but you creep into the keys that don't have the root note in them, that's where the helix gets made, you end up in another key but the notes you play have a shifting context, eventually you'll get back to C but you'll have passed through all the other keys first... carrying the musical narative for that length of time would be hard on the ears, so you'd have to come up with a strong predictable progression. say like Giant Steps (minor thirds), since a 5th is made of a major and minor third every two minor thirds you'll land on the tritone...

Some day I'll make the 3d sculpture I've got in my mind and someone who hates theory can come along and set fre to it Wink
_________________
Fabulous powers were revealed to me the day I held my magic Suhr(d) aloft and said "by the power of great scale!"

I have the power!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nielsri



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very nice Frankus!

I saw something similar (but not as good) a few years ago, demonstrating how to get smooth or jarring key changes. The closer the keys in your helix, the smoother the change will sound, the further apart the bigger the jump.

I like things like this which have a structure built on logic. I'm a big fan of the periodic table as well... Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
liquidtension



Joined: 09 Mar 2005
Posts: 92

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I picked up Levine's book about two years ago, and I seem to learn something new from it each time I pick it up.

Before Levine's book, I always approached music from a very "prescriptive" classical theory perspective, which was all I knew. Levine's whole approach really opened me up to viewing music "descriptively", which was quite freeing.

I really like Guthrie' ability to keep interest, momentum, and direction when he's playing outside. Theoretically, I understand it, but it's too much for me to process "on the spot" in the middle of a solo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
frankus



Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Posts: 1100
Location: Chelmsford/Arachnipus

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, I think his idea of outside or inside is just melodies and perhaps a bit of "this melody might make people look a bit frightened". The theory has been internalised so it just happens and is controlled without needing to whip out a massive chart of concepts.
_________________
Fabulous powers were revealed to me the day I held my magic Suhr(d) aloft and said "by the power of great scale!"

I have the power!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Resi



Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

frankus wrote:
yeah, I think his idea of outside or inside is just melodies and perhaps a bit of "this melody might make people look a bit frightened". The theory has been internalised so it just happens and is controlled without needing to whip out a massive chart of concepts.


Learn the changes... Then forget them Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tuddsound



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 30
Location: NY State, USA

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to agree, what once was musical heresy is now totally accepted. I was weaned on totally diatonic music and gradually got into jazzier players (but always with a ripping guitar tone). I think the general public is getting used to more adventurous sounds as well. Metal Bands like Rage Against The Machine and System of a Down throw a lot of dissonant sounding things into their music too.

Garsed is totally a master. I was watching the live footage on his instructional DVD, and my wife walked in and said how "nice" it sounded. She could tell that some of the notes were very jazzy, but his tone and feel made it seem palatable to her even though she doesn't like jazz. She said that Garsed doesn't "make her brain hurt" like some of the guys I listen to.

I think Guthrie has the same melodicism, but he can rip out some "brain hurting" jazz too. Very Happy
_________________
Paul Tauterouff
http://paultauterouff.com
http://myspace.com/paultauterouff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dee



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 91

PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with you about Brett Garsed, he's a monster. I knew it already, but this was confirmed to me after listening to previews of the new Planet X album. He shows a different side in Planet X with some lethal riffs!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Guthrie Govan Discussion Forum Index -> Guthrie Govan Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group